Which ones, Chris? Unfortunately, red plants often demand more things than most green ones.:blueworry: Macro nutrients, more lighting, etc.
We can put lotus on exception I guess.:mrgreen: There are few ones that are exceptions to the rule.
That plant is ludwigia, I have one in my 60 gallon and its very easy to care for. My lighting is medium and i add nothing to the tank and its growing like a weed. Only the top half of the plant is red, its more of the new growth is red and it slowly turns green.
A lot of photos like this are set up to take the pic then taken down. It would be amazing to keep something like that up for an extended period of time but i dont have the time for that.
I think it looks more natural than a lot I have seen. I don't have the link anymore but the ones I was talking baout are the "waterfalls": under water that are made with filter floss over rocks. Really cool looking tanks but wouldn't look that way long.
I really think that tanks looks awesome and should be bale to get it to look that way with a little work. If I can get the kind of growth I do with my 10 gallon tanks and lousy lighting I can only imagine what you can do with the proper setup.
As for the reds, low macros, especially NO3 is the key as well as high lighting. Which one is more important, I don't know, yet, haven't had the time or space to set up a proper experiment. I have seen it in both situations so I am not sure which is the "determining" factors. I know I got Sunset Hygro to go red even with high dosing but the lower plant looked terrible.
Great inspiration, it can be done and for those who want to go all out, is a good targeting tank to reach for, even if it does turn out to be a "show" tank.
forum community dedicated to tropical fish owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about species,breeding, health, behavior, aquariums, adopting, care, classifieds, and more! Open to fish, plants and reptiles living in freshwater or saltwater environments.