missed a few, from what you said there is also VHO and incandescent. VHO is similar to power compact and t-5's. It is in between t5 and power-compact in the light scale (i think) and is a popular light. They also come in blue light antic tubes. Incandescent is a worthless light in reef tanks, although you can get a cheap 200 watt incandescent bulb and say you have 10 wpg in a 20 gallon tank, the corals will die since the color of incandescent isnt what the corals want so stay clear of these.trreherd said:no, i think you missunderstood what you read. You have about 4 different ways of getting light. flourecent,t-5,powercompact,metal halide, and moon lighting. Im guessing all these different types of lighting are getting you confused, but its simple relly t-5,powercompact and regular flourecnt are all tubes and there good for a medium lit reef tank. The other is metal halide and thats for higher light demanding coral. actanic lighting is blue light(420-460nano-meter) But most other lightinhg is measured in kalvin. lower kalvin(2,000-9,000) are more yellow, and thats good for freshwater plants. higher calvins(10,000-20,000k) are more blue/white and thats good for reef tank lighting. For reef tanks the best lighting is actanics mixed with regular lighting. So you can get the flourecent,t-5, and cp in actanic or any other color you want, but metal halide only comes in 65k-20k. Moonlighting(led) is for nightime veiwing. not neccesary.
Trreherd actinics go all the way to 470nm. Coralife has a new actinic bulb that is royal blue and burns at 470nm.actanic lighting is blue light(420-460nano-meter)
Sorry, VHO is not worthless and is very good, incandescent is worthless and no use. I brought it up since if you follow the wpg rule only and see a 25 dollar 500 watt incandescent hood and think your getting like 10 wpg, it would be no good. Its more of a heads up, im mentioning all lights in the hobby.trreherd said:Musho if incandesent and vho are both worthless(from what i hear) than why bother mentioning them?
''Trreherd actinics go all the way to 470nm''
Ok im just triing to get him a basic understanding of lighting, so can we not try and confuse him(by geting all technical) and instead help with his questions?
Why not give the right info, I was just tring to inform you of that. Thats not technical. Why metion them because they are still considered lighting.trreherd said:Musho if incandesent and vho are both worthless(from what i hear) than why bother mentioning them?
''Trreherd actinics go all the way to 470nm''
Ok im just triing to get him a basic understanding of lighting, so can we not try and confuse him(by geting all technical) and instead help with his questions?
trreherd said:musho vho should not have been mentioned because its going out of style, the tubes are too expensive reletive to t-5 type lighting. You should have re-read his original question before mentioning incandesent OR this super actanic bulb usmc mentioned. Theres no need to try and confuse him.