CO2 and fertilizer
So I have a few tanks in my house (a 46, 20, 15, and a 3g) but up until recently I didnt know much about CO2 and never heard of fertilizers, can fertilizer be used instead of CO2 or should they be used together or what?
I plan on setting up a 50-75g tank in the near future and I love the plants but havent really had any problems with the ones in my other tanks with no CO2 or fertilizer. I saw a small CO2 thing on petsmart.com ( Hagen Plant Grow Natural System with CO2 - Live Plant Care - Fish - PetSmart ) that looks nice and i could just get a couple of them but ill keep looking for now.
So I guess Im just here looking for peoples experienced opinions/tips.
I'd pers add CO2 (if any) at last or rather not at all. All my tanks were planted so far and what I find most important to begin with is a proper light over the tank. Following this is nutrition for the plants, which can be good enough with good source water, but yours didn't sound like it if you said you have troubles. So then I'd suggest liquid fert's (such as Flourish Comprehensive) and if you intent to have Plants such as Swords I'd also add root tablets for them.
These 2 factors alone are generally good enough to grow real nice planted tanks. So I'd suggest to start there:-)
Actually I found the Daylight bulbs you'll find at your hardware store work great.
For the plants, get what you like - But careful on the Pennywort, stuff grows worst then weeds - See my 55g and Pannywort after a few days of non trimming attention here http://www.tropicalfishkeeping.com/a...nnywort-33810/
As previous replies have mentioned, the issue is balance between nutrients and light. Plants require nutrients which include carbon (from CO2 mainly, some less from carbonates), nitrogen (from ammonium/ammonia) and minerals. The carbon as CO2 and nitrogen as ammonium/ammonia comes from the fish and biological processes. The minerals come from fish food (before and after passing through the fish), tap water, and/or fertilizer (usually liquid, sometimes substrate for certain plants). When all this balances the light [1 watt per gallon of full spectrum is sufficient], the plants will grow fine. And the majority of aquarium plants will be healthy and thriving in this low-tech or natural setup.
The issue with adding CO2 is you then need more light and more fertilizer to balance. Plants will grow up to the point at which one of the essentials is no longer adequate. Liebig's "Law of Minimum" applies. Excess light, or excess CO2, or excess minerals will not allow plants to grow better if any one of these is inadequate. And that is when algae takes control. The more you add the more you affect the balance in the aquarium.
Growing plants is like building a fire. To build a fire you need fuel (like wood) heat and oxygen. If you don't have any one of these three you can't have a fire. To make the fire bigger you need to make sure all three of these are available in the right proportion. Not enough wood? The fire can only get so big. Limit the amount of air a fire can get, the fire only gets so big. (reducing the heat is harder to control)
Plants are the same way. Nutrients and a small amount of CO2 are generally already available in the water. Turning the light on is like adding heat to the wood and oxygen. As the light increases, the plants consume the available nutrients and CO2 to grow the plant. As the light increases, typically it the CO2 that runs out first. Increasing the light further only grows algae. And of course, if the CO2 is gone, adding more nutrients only aids the algae.
So the jump from low-tech to high-tech is when CO2 injection and increased lighting is made. But the jump is usually not necessary unless you'd like to grow a certain plant that requires more light.
These answers have just made some of this planted tank/lighting/co2 stuff much clearer. Thanks.
But let's expand a minute. Lower lighting for low to medium light requiring plants and some ferts can generally be done without co2 and all the fuss. What if you plant your tank somewhat heavily? If someone was going to plant a 55g fairly densely with plants, and by fairly dense I mean not so much packed with plants but some decent coverage, would that require more co2 from a supply not available to the plants just from the natural goings on in a tank?
If the plants are the "wood" and you are going to add more and more you need more and more oxygen for the fire to get bigger. You can add all the wood "plants" you want but if the oxygen"co2 and lighting" isn't there the fire won't get bigger. It will snuff out. So is your concept of natural limiting the amount of plants one can plant? How does one know the cut off line of too many plants better add co2 and this is sufficient?
I had 55's that were indeed more PLANT then tank at one stage or another (poor trimming on my end / laziness) and even then I didn't add CO2 and if you look at my pic's it speaks for itself.
Also try check out Byron's planted tanks (think he called it "Former 55g") - That also speaks for itself IMO and as far as I know (and pls Byron correct me if I'm wrong there) B. also does not use CO2 Injection.
Correct Angel, I have never used CO2 and see no need to ever consider doing so. I have what I consider to be quite heavily planted aquaria and have had tanks like these for 20 years. CO2 is not a necessity except for very high-end setups like Takashi Amano's tanks or the Dutch style (if this is still the term used for the mainly-plant, few or no fish tanks).
Mean Harri, have a look at my photos, particularly the present flooded Amazon forest 90g aquarium. I consider this tank thickly planted, even more-so than my others. There is no CO2, light is less than one watt per gallon of full spectrum/cool white combo (one tube each), and twice weekly liquid fertilization. The fish load varies from 75 to 110, all characins, Corydoras, three Farlowella. Obviously there is a balance that works.
There are a lot of plant species that will flourish in this type of setup. I have observed tremendous growth from the Echinodorus (swords) in both my Amazon tanks, so much so that I cannot imagine any more if I were to use CO2 and increased lighting. Forcing the plants to grow faster is comparable to doing similar for the fish--why? Better to let both just "cruise along" and provide years of enjoyment.
I can explain further on my simple method if asked.
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2