Ok i have a quick question....do i ever need to do a 50% or more water change?
a filter question.....
I was wondering instead of using a regular filter can i use the marineland active carbon that cleans out the ammonia too in a media bag?
I do a 50% every 6 months. IT IS REQUIRED
Sometimes, a 50% water change is needed if you see a huge spike in nitrates or other parameter problem.....otherwise, a 15-20% water change weekly will elminate the need for a 50%
I do 50% weekly on my tanks. If stats are all ok then you can change how ever much you want. As long as it is >15% IMO.
The media also has no flexibility. When you first put it in the tank it starts sucking up ammonia. If enough media is present it'll be able to adsorb the substance as quickly as the fish make it. Unfortunately the media simply stores the ammonia. As more and more are adsorbed the media loses the ability to store more rapidly. Eventually the media can't store the ammonia as quickly as your fish are making it. Now ammonia starts to build up in your tank, the media is considered spent, and you have to replace it. How long does this take? No one knows, so regular testing is a must, at least every other day. Even if you figure out the duration each bag of media lasts you still have to test because if something causes a nutrient spike in the tank the surge of ammonia can wear out the media sooner. If you don't test you won't replace in time, the ammonia builds up and the next bag of media wears out quicker again exposing your fish to ammonia.
Both from a cost standpoint and a fishkeeping standpoint the ammonia chips are not an acceptable replacement for an established biofilter.
I concur with all previous posts. I'd like to expand a couple of points.
Rewgular water changes are in my view (and most others) mandatory. It is better to change less water more often than more water less often. [Aquakid, you mentioned 50% every 6 months, but I'll assume you do less every week and you are not really saying you only change water twice a year.] The reason is fish health, which I thnk I explained in detail in my 04-06-2009 resonse in the thread "what is the reason for water changes" in this same forum section, so I won't repeat all that; I don't know your level of experience, so you may gain some new insight by reading that post.
Tyyrlym said it clearly, the only good filtration is an established biological one using nature. You don't indicate when this tank was setup, but once the initial cycling process has run its course (2-8 weeks) the biological equilibrium in a tank is established and will maintain itself with no problems--PROVIDED you do not interfere with it by suddenly overloading the biomass (too many new fish, overfeeding, dead fish or excessive dead plant material not immediately removed, etc), overcleaning the filter and substrate, or doing something to the water that affects the biological equilibrium.
As you can see from our responses we have varying amounts of water (15% to 50%) but one constancy--weekly. I do at least 35%, sometimes almost 50% every week. As long as it is regular you should have no problems related to water chemistry. And your fish will thank you with less stress which equates to good health and normal (interesting) behaviours.
Don't remember where I heard it, but I believe someone said that as long as you do water changes that add up to 100% a month you should be fine. Like a 50% twice a month, or a 25% once a week. I usually do like a 25-50 every 1-2 weeks, depending on how the water looks and what the levels are.
Doing 50% every other week is better than nothing, but doing 25% each week is much better. In nature, fish live in water that is either constantly moving past them (streams, rivers, creeks) or in a lake that has considerably more volume that will be affected by the fish population. In both cases, the water around them is not static but changing, which means the toxins the fish expel (ammonia through respiration, excrement, urine) is not staying where the fish is forced to live in it, but moving away. At the same time, the water is bringing minerals and oxygen to the fish, and there is no danger of the fish using all the available minerals or oxygen because of the water movement. In a lake the thermal currents constantly keep the water in motion to avoid stratification. The African rift lakes are a good illustration. They are so deep that the lower water strata never mixes with the upper surface water. It is no surprise therefore that the cichlids do not live in the lower levels. They would in fact asphyxiate if they moved into those regions.
I mentioned my earlier post before, but as it is germaine to this particular issue, I'm going to repeat some of it. As was the thrust of that thread, the issue is not how the water looks or what the nitrate reading might be that determines the need for a water change; its an absolute necessity (for the health of the fish) regardless of how good the water quality may be.
The aim is to maintain consistent water quality permanently. This is not as impossible as some may think. There are fluctuations that occur naturally, in nature and in our aquarium. Fish have evolved to adapt to these minor fluctuations. This involves temperature and pH (there are diurnal fluctuations both in nature and in an aquarium), hardness, and dissolved organics in the water. Fish are very closely tied to their environment. As an example, fish take in water through their cells by osmosis. The fish must adjust its internal pH to equal that of the water passing into its cells. In an excellent article on "Fish Growth vs. Tank Size" in the December 2006 issue of TFH, Laura Muha notes that "Both salinity and pH affects a fish's growth rate because they affect how hard a fish's body must work to maintain its physiological equilibrium--that is, the complex chain of internal chemical reactions that keep the pH of its blood steady, its tissues fed, and its immune system functioning. When pH and/or salinity stray outside the ideal range for any given species, the fishes' bodies must work harder and use more energy to maintain this equilibrium." We all know how stress affects humans, and it is now known that this occurs with fish as well. Having fluctuating water conditions means the fish is constantly having to adjust its metabolism, and this stresses the fish and can lead to poor health, disease, and even death if not corrected. The point of regular water changes is establishing an equilibrium in the tank and therefore in the fish, resulting in healthier and happier fsh. Changing 25-40% of the water every week is maintaining such a balance, because it ensures that the pH will remain relative constant, along with the levels of minerals in the water, and the nitrate level.
Many who keep discus change this much water every day. It would obviously be good for all our fish if we could manage a partial water change every day, but I know that I would have difficulty achieving this.
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.