Glo-fish - Page 2 - Tropical Fish Keeping - Aquarium fish care and resources
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 26 Old 02-27-2009, 11:13 AM
New Member
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishkid View Post
They aren't dyed. They are genetically altered zebra danios. They are just like regular zebra danios. Also Glo-fish are copyrighted and even distrubuting any fry is illegal.
being genetically modified, will they even be fertile???
laeclaserind is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 26 Old 02-27-2009, 07:24 PM
New Member
 
kamazza's Avatar
 
I don't believe they are sterile. The gene they are injected with doesn't affect their fertility/reproduction. Atleast thats what it seems they are trying to say. I've heard it elsewhere. I couldn't find it on the site but of course they wouldn't come out and say it, they don't want people breeding them and making money they could be making!

14gallon(heavily planted)- 1 Blue Ram, 5 Green Tiger Barbs, 1
Spotted Raphael Catfish, 1 Bumble Bee Catfish, 2 Golden
Chinese Algae Eater
1gallon- Blue/Orange Betta-male
Large Vase #1- Blue/Yellow Betta-male
Large Vase #2- Blue/Black Betta-male
kamazza is offline  
post #13 of 26 Old 02-27-2009, 08:05 PM
New Member
 
hmmm... i always assumed since they were genetically modified they were sterile, our walmart (bad place for fish probably but cheap) has glo-fish for 3.99 as opposed to 11.99 at my LFS, might be kind of cool to breed (legal?)
laeclaserind is offline  
post #14 of 26 Old 02-27-2009, 09:40 PM
New Member
 
kamazza's Avatar
 
im sure you could get away with it, but i believe they are patented, sounds funny saying a fish is patented... you would just have to be careful I guess, although I dont know how big the chances are of the company finding out

14gallon(heavily planted)- 1 Blue Ram, 5 Green Tiger Barbs, 1
Spotted Raphael Catfish, 1 Bumble Bee Catfish, 2 Golden
Chinese Algae Eater
1gallon- Blue/Orange Betta-male
Large Vase #1- Blue/Yellow Betta-male
Large Vase #2- Blue/Black Betta-male
kamazza is offline  
post #15 of 26 Old 03-02-2009, 05:36 PM
Member
 
iamntbatman's Avatar
 
Definitely illegal to breed them on purpose. If you want them, I'd say buy them from Wal-mart as they're about half the price of the cheapest ones you'd find anywhere else. I've seen them go for up to $15 a pop at more expensive LFS's. They really are just zebra danios, though, so they should be hardy enough to survive Wal-mart conditions.

Their care is exactly the same as the zebra danio's: keep them in a school at tropical temperatures in a tank with plenty of room to swim and feed them standard fish foods.

4 8 15 16 23 42
iamntbatman is offline  
post #16 of 26 Old 03-02-2009, 05:44 PM
Member
 
MBilyeu's Avatar
 
I believe that the patent only covers the sale of them, so I think that it is fine to breed them on purpose as long as your only intention is for stocking your own displays.

My wife rolls her eyes when I talk about getting another tank
MBilyeu is offline  
post #17 of 26 Old 03-02-2009, 05:47 PM
Member
 
iamntbatman's Avatar
 
From their website:

"4) Intentional breeding and/or any sale, barter, or trade, of any offspring of GloFish® fluorescent ornamental fish is strictly prohibited.


5) Notwithstanding the foregoing, production of these fish is permitted for educational use by teachers and students in bona fide educational institutions, provided, however, that any sale, barter, or trade, of the offspring from such reproduction of these fish is strictly prohibited. "


So, unless you're a teacher, even breeding them to stock your own tanks is illegal.

4 8 15 16 23 42
iamntbatman is offline  
post #18 of 26 Old 03-03-2009, 03:00 PM
New Member
 
lol forget that. I'll do what I what when I want with my own stuff. sounds like the mpaa and riaa are trying to extend their control into my aquarium, no thank you sir.

p.s.: maybe they'll start a fppa (fish patent protection agency)
laeclaserind is offline  
post #19 of 26 Old 03-03-2009, 03:28 PM
Member
 
iamntbatman's Avatar
 
Well, the company that owns the patent on the fish definitely has a right to have such a restriction in place. Whether or not it's enforceable is another matter, but I can see how they'd want you to buy more of their products rather than breed your own.

Plus, it's kind of a different bit of territory than music or movie piracy. Breeding more fish for the purpose of filling more tanks isn't really the same thing as making copies of music you purchased for backup purposes or whatever.

4 8 15 16 23 42
iamntbatman is offline  
post #20 of 26 Old 03-04-2009, 09:12 AM
Member
 
Tyyrlym's Avatar
 
I'd like to see them actually prove that someone intentionally bred the fish and it didn't just happen because the fish felt like it. Heck, I'd love to know how they'd even plan to find out someone is breeding the fish for their own tanks. It's legal boiler plate. Heck, I doubt most buyers would even know about the restriction on breeding them as the fish stores treat them like any other fish, I don't see them handing out flyers about the buyer's legal obligations in regards to the fish's reproductive habits.

Tetra Fanatic
Watch my tank progress from Craigslist salvage to fishy habitat: Aaron's Tank
The only things that happen quickly in an aquarium are bad things.
Tyyrlym is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome