Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters
Tropical Fish

Tropical Fish Keeping - Aquarium fish care and resources » Freshwater Fish and Aquariums » Beginner Freshwater Aquarium » Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters

Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters

This is a discussion on Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters within the Beginner Freshwater Aquarium forums, part of the Freshwater Fish and Aquariums category; --> What are the pros and cons of each and what do you favor?...

Check out these freshwater fish profiles
Scalare Angelfish
Scalare Angelfish
Bolivian Ram
Bolivian Ram
Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools vBmenu Seperating Image Search this Thread vBmenu Seperating Image
Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters
Old 07-25-2011, 07:34 PM   #1
 
Wet/Dry Sump VS. Canistr Filters

What are the pros and cons of each and what do you favor?
MetalArm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 10:23 PM   #2
 
Was this a trick question?

Wet/dry sumps often with bio-balls and/or other bio-media and sometimes in conjunction with protein skimmer, algae filter etc. are often used for salt water aquariums, but rarely for fresh water. Care must be taken to control the siphon volume relative to the return to ensure against runover (e.g. in the event of a power failure, the siphon must break).

For smaller Fresh water tanks, the HOB rules and there are some very good ones (I use 2 AquaClear 70's on my 60g.). For the larger tank sizes, the canister filter seems like the best choice. Sometimes one or more HOBs AND a canister. The canister provides ample space for mechanical, chemical and biological media.

As I have learned from friends here, a well managed and well planted tank will only require minor filtration as the eco-system handles filtration. It is also deserving of note that some filters don't handle reduced flow settings well and many fish will not do well with excessive current produced by high GPH return water.
AbbeysDad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AbbeysDad For This Useful Post:
MetalArm3 (07-26-2011)
Old 07-25-2011, 10:56 PM   #3
 
Not a trick question. I have been hearing more about sumps being used on freshwater tanks because it's easy to clean, can hides heater and other equipment, and allows your tank to hold an additional 20gal. I was looking at the Aqueon Wet/Dry Sump: Aquarium Wet Dry Filters: Aqueon ProFlex Sump Filtration System at FosterandSmithaquatics.com and was interested how they compare to canister filters?

I have a Marineland penguin 350 and am becoming more agitated with it every day, will probably buy a canister. But while doing research on them I cam across this.....
MetalArm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 11:01 PM   #4
 
Just my $.02, but I'm thinking you'd be better served with a top of the line canister and save some money in the bargain.
AbbeysDad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 11:18 PM   #5
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbbeysDad View Post
Just my $.02, but I'm thinking you'd be better served with a top of the line canister and save some money in the bargain.
Couldn't agree more! I just wanted to know how the two compare in effectiveness. I see these sumps and DIY sumps mainly if 100gal plus ranks, and it sounds like a good idea. The only thing I would be concerned with us noisiness.
MetalArm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 10:58 AM   #6
 
Byron's Avatar
 
From my research on bacteria, it seems that sponge filters, canister filters and wet/dry filters will all provide roughly equal biological filtration provided they are properly maintained. The wet/dry work for very large tanks, but no better than canisters on tanks under 200g.

At this point, one must also consider the intented aquascape, as AbbeysDad mentioned. Planted aquaria do not require biological filtration because the plants are doing that, so any filter that encourages this would be detrimental. A sponge filter on tanks up to 55g and a canister over that work well. Both of these also have minimal flow, or in the case of canisters the flow can be adjusted; and this is imortant for plants and also fish, since most planted tanks will contain forest fish and these do not appreciate a lot of current, with a few exceptions.

Byron.
Byron is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Byron For This Useful Post:
MetalArm3 (07-26-2011)
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To sump or not to sump...HEEEEELLLLP! RabbitsAreSlow Beginner Freshwater Aquarium 5 09-04-2009 11:58 PM
Sump,Skimmer,Filters,ect ??? MT1071 Beginner Saltwater Aquariums 30 06-28-2009 11:15 PM
sump or ready to use filters? MRQuad Freshwater and Tropical Fish 2 08-03-2008 11:35 PM
Canister filters vs. Hang-on filters. MattD Freshwater Aquarium Equipment 7 06-09-2007 10:49 PM
another noob introduction! to sump or not to sump? en71ce Saltwater Aquarium Equipment 25 03-02-2007 05:08 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.