San Francisco Considers Ban on Fish as pets - Page 3 - Tropical Fish Keeping - Aquarium fish care and resources
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 25 Old 06-18-2011, 06:28 AM
bigehugedome's Avatar
My girlfriend worked at a pet$mart, and I'm pretty sure if you wanted to buy a bird, you had to prove you could hold it, and have it walk from hand to hand( by putting one finger out so the bird could walk onto it, like climbing a ladder) before you could take it home. The employees would help you do this.

If they can do that then why can't the take 5 more mins to ask you about your current fish experience and go over some things, like cycling and stocking, before you can buy the fish.
Posted via Mobile Device
bigehugedome is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #22 of 25 Old 06-18-2011, 09:13 AM
New Member
MyLittlePleco's Avatar
Come to think of it, people, I think it would make more sense to ban the keeping of any kinds of animals as pets. That way we can make sure nobody hurts animals.
Oh, and banning the consumption of meat, too.
And why not ban social interaction with any living organism while we're at it, too?

That way no one will ever harm anyone or anything else again.
I'm sure most of you will agree.

/end of sarcasm
MyLittlePleco is offline  
post #23 of 25 Old 06-18-2011, 09:24 AM
New Member
Ram Lover's Avatar
Soon there will be inspectors coming to check your water every week...with the down economy maybe we'll save some money on water testing kits! Fees for registering aquariums with a governmental agency, tracking devices on pet fish, screening and/or license required to purchase fish, etc.

On a more serious note...if this ever passes, it will eventually spread to every state. California is always setting the standards for laws and regulations.

Unfortunately, this is a hobby and most of us get better by making mistakes. Not going to be able to save them all, but it is our responsibility to do the research so it doesn't happen again.

What a mess!
Ram Lover is offline  
post #24 of 25 Old 06-18-2011, 09:28 AM
New Member
MyLittlePleco's Avatar
On a more serious note, I think that banning the sale of "fish bowls" or any related containers which are unsuitable for containing fish healthily would be a much more effective action.

If they ban the sale of goldfish, they've left out a number of Bettas who suffer too.
Ban the sale of Bettas, and you've still got a few fishkeepers who unwittingly allow their fish to suffer.
MyLittlePleco is offline  
post #25 of 25 Old 06-18-2011, 01:03 PM
large chains are in for the money not the quality care like us hobbyist do... Thats why they don't ask for our tank size etc. with birds I think they take their time because birds are more expsive whole sale than a 14 cent fish.

38 gallon :
Pelvicachromis Taeniatus Nigerian Red not yet breeding pair
4 Pangio Kuhli
12 Hemmigrammus Bleheri
2 Botia Lohachata
1 Botia Straita
1 Ancistrus Sp.
6 Poecilia Reticulata

The Wet Spot Portland Oregon!!!!!!

ADA: Do!aqua Iwagumi 10 gallon size!
7 Clown Killies
7 Ghost shrimp
Christople is offline  

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Other Pets' Names(excluding the fish) Deefish Off Topic Discussions 16 09-27-2006 12:14 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome